Quantcast

West LA Times

Wednesday, March 26, 2025

Study supports shorter radiation regimen for early-stage prostate cancer

Webp 7z8th4p24y344a5wifa6dq0nt83i

Gene Block Chancellor | University Of California, Los Angeles

Gene Block Chancellor | University Of California, Los Angeles

A recent study co-led by UCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center researchers indicates that a shorter, standard-dose course of radiation treatment is as effective as conventional radiotherapy for prostate cancer. The study confirms that the approach known as isodose moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (MHFRT) delivers similar cancer control rates without increasing long-term side effects.

This MHFRT method administers slightly higher doses of radiation per session, reducing the total treatment time to four to five weeks compared to the traditional seven to eight weeks. According to the findings published in Lancet Oncology, patients receiving this type of MHFRT experienced equivalent cancer control rates and no increase in bladder or intestinal side effects compared to those undergoing conventional radiotherapy.

Dr. Amar Kishan, executive vice chair of radiation oncology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and co-first author of the study, stated: “We believe these data strongly support that isodose MHFRT should become the preferred standard of care MHFRT regimen for prostate cancer.”

Concerns remain regarding whether higher daily doses could heighten risks such as urinary incontinence and chronic diarrhea. However, an analysis involving over 5,800 patients across seven randomized clinical trials found no significant difference in five-year progression-free survival between patients receiving isodose MHFRT and those undergoing conventional therapy. Both groups reported similar outcomes, with a slight advantage in gastrointestinal side effects favoring conventional therapy.

Despite expectations that dose-escalated MHFRT might improve outcomes, it showed no additional benefit in cancer control and posed a higher risk of gastrointestinal issues. Dr. Kishan noted this highlights the advantages of isodose MHFRT: “These findings reinforce isodose MHFRT as the standard of care, offering the same cancer control as conventional treatment but with fewer side effects than dose-escalated MHFRT.”

The study was supported by grants from the Department of Defense and the National Institutes of Health.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate

MORE NEWS